WHO chief angrily denies it has ‘quietly shelved’ investigation into Covid’s origins
The World Health Organization will continue pushing until it finds an answer to how the Covid-19 pandemic started, the agency's chief said Wednesday following a report suggesting it had abandoned the search.
"We need to continue to push until we get the answer," Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus told reporters, referring to the search for the origins of the virus that first surfaced in China in late 2019.
Solving the mystery of where the SARS CoV-2 virus came from and how it began spreading among humans is viewed as vital to averting future pandemics.
The two main theories that have been hotly debated have centred on the virus naturally spilling over from bats to an intermediary animal and into humans, or escaping due to a lab accident.
But an article on the Nature website Tuesday suggested that the WHO has "quietly shelved the second phase of its much-anticipated scientific investigation into the origins of the Covid-19 pandemic".
It quoted Maria Van Kerkhove, the WHO expert leading the agency's Covid response, saying that "there is no phase two".
The WHO planned for work to be done in phases, she told the report, but "that plan has changed", adding that "The politics across the world of this really hampered progress on understanding the origins".
Van Kerkhove responded angrily Wednesday when asked about the article, attributing the interpretation that WHO had shelved its origins search to "an error in reporting, which is really quite concerning because it's causing some headlines that are inaccurate".
"WHO has not abandoned studying the origins of Covid-19, we have not and we will not," she said.
The WHO carried out a first phase of investigation by sending a team of international experts to Wuhan, China, in January 2021 to produce a first phase report, written in conjunction with their Chinese counterparts.
While the initial plan had been to send a second team, Van Kerkhove said the WHO had shifted tactics and decided instead to create a team of scientists with an expanded scope to investigate new pathogens and study how to prevent future pandemics, while continuing to probe Covid-19's origins.
The Scientific Advisory Group for the Origins of Novel Pathogens (SAGO) was created "to conduct an independent assessment of the origins of Covid-19, but also to work more broadly to establish a framework to understand the origins of any future epidemic and pandemic pathogen, and the origins in which it emerges," Van Kerkhove said.
"We will continue to ask for countries to depoliticise this work, but we need cooperation from our colleagues in China to advance this," she said.
Tedros said there were two reasons for not abandoning the origins search.
The first was scientific, he said: "We need to know how this started in order to prevent the next one."
"The second (is) moral: millions of people lost their lives, and many suffered, and the whole world was taken hostage by a virus."
"It's morally very important to know how we lost our loved ones."
Solving the mystery of where the SARS CoV-2 virus came from and how it began spreading among humans is viewed as vital to averting future pandemics.
The two main theories that have been hotly debated have centred on the virus naturally spilling over from bats to an intermediary animal and into humans, or escaping due to a lab accident.
But an article on the Nature website Tuesday suggested that the WHO has "quietly shelved the second phase of its much-anticipated scientific investigation into the origins of the Covid-19 pandemic".
It quoted Maria Van Kerkhove, the WHO expert leading the agency's Covid response, saying that "there is no phase two".
The WHO planned for work to be done in phases, she told the report, but "that plan has changed", adding that "The politics across the world of this really hampered progress on understanding the origins".
Van Kerkhove responded angrily Wednesday when asked about the article, attributing the interpretation that WHO had shelved its origins search to "an error in reporting, which is really quite concerning because it's causing some headlines that are inaccurate".
"WHO has not abandoned studying the origins of Covid-19, we have not and we will not," she said.
The WHO carried out a first phase of investigation by sending a team of international experts to Wuhan, China, in January 2021 to produce a first phase report, written in conjunction with their Chinese counterparts.
While the initial plan had been to send a second team, Van Kerkhove said the WHO had shifted tactics and decided instead to create a team of scientists with an expanded scope to investigate new pathogens and study how to prevent future pandemics, while continuing to probe Covid-19's origins.
The Scientific Advisory Group for the Origins of Novel Pathogens (SAGO) was created "to conduct an independent assessment of the origins of Covid-19, but also to work more broadly to establish a framework to understand the origins of any future epidemic and pandemic pathogen, and the origins in which it emerges," Van Kerkhove said.
"We will continue to ask for countries to depoliticise this work, but we need cooperation from our colleagues in China to advance this," she said.
Tedros said there were two reasons for not abandoning the origins search.
The first was scientific, he said: "We need to know how this started in order to prevent the next one."
"The second (is) moral: millions of people lost their lives, and many suffered, and the whole world was taken hostage by a virus."
"It's morally very important to know how we lost our loved ones."
AI Disclaimer: An advanced artificial intelligence (AI) system generated the content of this page on its own. This innovative technology conducts extensive research from a variety of reliable sources, performs rigorous fact-checking and verification, cleans up and balances biased or manipulated content, and presents a minimal factual summary that is just enough yet essential for you to function as an informed and educated citizen. Please keep in mind, however, that this system is an evolving technology, and as a result, the article may contain accidental inaccuracies or errors. We urge you to help us improve our site by reporting any inaccuracies you find using the "Contact Us" link at the bottom of this page. Your helpful feedback helps us improve our system and deliver more precise content. When you find an article of interest here, please look for the full and extensive coverage of this topic in traditional news sources, as they are written by professional journalists that we try to support, not replace. We appreciate your understanding and assistance.
