London Stock Exchange rejects Hong Kong's $37 billion takeover bid
The London Stock Exchange has roundly rejected Hong Kong's $37 billion takeover bid, saying it was too low, politically risky and lacked strategic merit.
In a strongly worded statement Friday, LSE's board said it "unanimously" rejects this week's conditional proposal from Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing.
In a strongly worded statement Friday, LSE's board said it "unanimously" rejects this week's conditional proposal from Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing.
LSE added that it sees "no merit in further engagement" because of the offer's "fundamental flaws." The London exchange said it remained committed to its acquisition of financial data provider Refinitiv.
Analysts had widely expected the HKEX bid to fail, given worries about Chinese influence over vital financial infrastructure and concerns about reduced competition.
HKEX responded in a statement that said it "continues to believe that the proposed combination ... represents a highly compelling strategic opportunity."
The Hong Kong company suggested that it could now make a hostile bid that would allow investors in LSE to choose between an improved offer and the planned purchase of Refinitiv.
"HKEX believes that shareholders in LSE should have the opportunity to analyze in detail both transactions and will continue to engage with them," the statement said.
Analysts at Citi said in a research note
that they expect a second offer from HKEX that includes more cash and
improved terms. But they warned that regulatory hurdles still threaten
any deal.
Exchange concerns
LSE chairman Don Robert said the exchange was "surprised and disappointed" that HKEX (HKXCF) published its "unsolicited proposal within two days of our receiving it."
LSE chairman Don Robert said the exchange was "surprised and disappointed" that HKEX (HKXCF) published its "unsolicited proposal within two days of our receiving it."
The unexpected bid was published Wednesday, suggesting that LSE received the offer on Monday.
The transaction posed serious risks and lacked value for shareholders, Robert said in a letter addressed to the chairperson and CEO of HKEX.
HKEX's relationship with the Hong Kong government would "complicate matters," making it "highly uncertain" that necessary approvals would be obtained, Robert said.
HKEX's relationship with the Hong Kong government would "complicate matters," making it "highly uncertain" that necessary approvals would be obtained, Robert said.
The Hong Kong government directly appoints half of the HKEX board, according to its website. And the chairman's appointment must be approved by Hong Kong's chief executive, Carrie Lam.
Robert also raised concerns about continued social unrest in Hong Kong, saying the "ongoing situation" in the territory adds to uncertainty.
For shareholders, the proposition was unattractive given that they would be paid mostly in HKEX shares, Robert said.
"We see the value of your share consideration as inherently uncertain," said Robert. "Furthermore, we question the sustainability of HKEX's position as a strategic gateway in the longer term."
The proposal would be a "backward step" for LSE strategically, given the high geographic concentration of HKEX's portfolio.
"We do not believe HKEX provides us with the best long-term positioning in Asia or the best listing/trading platform for China," he said, noting that LSE values its current partnership with the Shanghai Stock Exchange.
Even if the proposal were deliverable, it fell "substantially short" of an appropriate valuation for a takeover of LSE, "especially when compared to the significant value we expect to create through our planned acquisition of Refinitiv," Robert said.
HKEX's offer was conditional on LSE terminating its proposed acquisition of Refinitiv, announced only last month. That £22 billion ($27 billion) deal is aimed at transforming the LSE into a global markets and information juggernaut to rival Michael Bloomberg's financial data empire.
LSE's forceful rejection was aimed at discouraging HKEX from pursuing the deal any further, rather than dissuading a third party from getting involved.
AI Disclaimer: An advanced artificial intelligence (AI) system generated the content of this page on its own. This innovative technology conducts extensive research from a variety of reliable sources, performs rigorous fact-checking and verification, cleans up and balances biased or manipulated content, and presents a minimal factual summary that is just enough yet essential for you to function as an informed and educated citizen. Please keep in mind, however, that this system is an evolving technology, and as a result, the article may contain accidental inaccuracies or errors. We urge you to help us improve our site by reporting any inaccuracies you find using the "Contact Us" link at the bottom of this page. Your helpful feedback helps us improve our system and deliver more precise content. When you find an article of interest here, please look for the full and extensive coverage of this topic in traditional news sources, as they are written by professional journalists that we try to support, not replace. We appreciate your understanding and assistance.
