Judge blocks Trump bid to remove WeChat from stores over China fears
San Francisco judge cites free speech concerns, while Trump backs TikTok Oracle deal which may include Walmart
A US judge has blocked the Trump administration from requiring Apple and Google to remove Chinese-owned messaging app WeChat for downloads by late on Sunday.
US magistrate judge Laurel Beeler in San Francisco said in an order that WeChat users who filed a lawsuit “have shown serious questions going to the merits of the first amendment claim, the balance of hardships tips in the plaintiffs’ favor.”.
Her 22-page order added the prohibitions “burden substantially more speech than is necessary to serve the government’s significant interest in national security, especially given the lack of substitute channels for communication.”.
On Friday, the US commerce department issued an order citing national security grounds to block the app from US app stores owned by Tencent Holdings. The justice department had urged Beeler not to block the order, saying doing so would “frustrate and displace the president’s determination of how best to address threats to national security”. Tencent and the justice department did not immediately comment on Sunday.
Beeler’s preliminary injunction also blocked the commerce order that would have barred other transactions with WeChat in the US and could have dramatically degraded the site’s usability for current US users or potentially made it unusable. The commerce department did not immediately comment.
WeChat is an all-in-one mobile app that combines services similar to Facebook, WhatsApp, Instagram and Venmo. The app is an essential part of daily life for many in China and boasts more than 1 billion users.
WeChat has an average of 19 million daily active users in the US, analytics firms Apptopia said in August. It is popular among Chinese students, Americans living in China and some Americans who have personal or business relationships in China.
Beeler wrote: “Certainly the government’s overarching national-security interest is significant. But on this record – while the government has established that China’s activities raise significant national security concerns – it has put in scant little evidence that its effective ban of WeChat for all US users addresses those concerns.”
The justice department also argued that WeChat users could switch to other apps or platforms.
The WeChat Users Alliance that sued praised the ruling “as an important and hard-fought victory” for “millions of WeChat users in the US”.
Michael Bien, a lawyer for the users, said: “The United States has never shut down a major platform for communications, not even during war times. There are serious first amendment problems with the WeChat ban, which targets the Chinese American community.”
He added the order “trampled on their first amendment guaranteed freedoms to speak, to worship, to read and react to the press, and to organize and associate for numerous purposes”.
Beeler also noted “there are obvious alternatives to a complete ban, such as barring WeChat from government devices”.
She added “The regulation – which eliminates a channel of communication without any apparent substitutes – burdens substantially more speech than is necessary to further the government’s significant interest.“
Separately, the commerce department said it was delaying enforcement of another order issued on Friday that would also have banned US app stores from offering TikTok starting late on Sunday.
The one-week delay came after Donald Trump blessed a deal with TikTok owner ByteDance and US companies Oracle and Walmart to create a new company to handle TikTok’s US operations.
US magistrate judge Laurel Beeler in San Francisco said in an order that WeChat users who filed a lawsuit “have shown serious questions going to the merits of the first amendment claim, the balance of hardships tips in the plaintiffs’ favor.”.
Her 22-page order added the prohibitions “burden substantially more speech than is necessary to serve the government’s significant interest in national security, especially given the lack of substitute channels for communication.”.
On Friday, the US commerce department issued an order citing national security grounds to block the app from US app stores owned by Tencent Holdings. The justice department had urged Beeler not to block the order, saying doing so would “frustrate and displace the president’s determination of how best to address threats to national security”. Tencent and the justice department did not immediately comment on Sunday.
Beeler’s preliminary injunction also blocked the commerce order that would have barred other transactions with WeChat in the US and could have dramatically degraded the site’s usability for current US users or potentially made it unusable. The commerce department did not immediately comment.
WeChat is an all-in-one mobile app that combines services similar to Facebook, WhatsApp, Instagram and Venmo. The app is an essential part of daily life for many in China and boasts more than 1 billion users.
WeChat has an average of 19 million daily active users in the US, analytics firms Apptopia said in August. It is popular among Chinese students, Americans living in China and some Americans who have personal or business relationships in China.
Beeler wrote: “Certainly the government’s overarching national-security interest is significant. But on this record – while the government has established that China’s activities raise significant national security concerns – it has put in scant little evidence that its effective ban of WeChat for all US users addresses those concerns.”
The justice department also argued that WeChat users could switch to other apps or platforms.
The WeChat Users Alliance that sued praised the ruling “as an important and hard-fought victory” for “millions of WeChat users in the US”.
Michael Bien, a lawyer for the users, said: “The United States has never shut down a major platform for communications, not even during war times. There are serious first amendment problems with the WeChat ban, which targets the Chinese American community.”
He added the order “trampled on their first amendment guaranteed freedoms to speak, to worship, to read and react to the press, and to organize and associate for numerous purposes”.
Beeler also noted “there are obvious alternatives to a complete ban, such as barring WeChat from government devices”.
She added “The regulation – which eliminates a channel of communication without any apparent substitutes – burdens substantially more speech than is necessary to further the government’s significant interest.“
Separately, the commerce department said it was delaying enforcement of another order issued on Friday that would also have banned US app stores from offering TikTok starting late on Sunday.
The one-week delay came after Donald Trump blessed a deal with TikTok owner ByteDance and US companies Oracle and Walmart to create a new company to handle TikTok’s US operations.
AI Disclaimer: An advanced artificial intelligence (AI) system generated the content of this page on its own. This innovative technology conducts extensive research from a variety of reliable sources, performs rigorous fact-checking and verification, cleans up and balances biased or manipulated content, and presents a minimal factual summary that is just enough yet essential for you to function as an informed and educated citizen. Please keep in mind, however, that this system is an evolving technology, and as a result, the article may contain accidental inaccuracies or errors. We urge you to help us improve our site by reporting any inaccuracies you find using the "Contact Us" link at the bottom of this page. Your helpful feedback helps us improve our system and deliver more precise content. When you find an article of interest here, please look for the full and extensive coverage of this topic in traditional news sources, as they are written by professional journalists that we try to support, not replace. We appreciate your understanding and assistance.
