Amazon wants to question Trump over loss of $10bn 'war cloud' contract
Amazon wants Donald Trump to submit to questioning over the tech company’s losing bid for a $10bn military contract. The Pentagon awarded the cloud computing project to Microsoft in October. Amazon later sued, arguing that Trump’s interference and bias against the company harmed Amazon’s chances.
Amazon was considered an early frontrunner for a project that Pentagon officials have described as critical to advancing the US military’s technological advantage over adversaries.
The project, known as Joint Enterprise Defense Infrastructure, or Jedi, will store and process vast amounts of classified data, allowing the US military to improve communications with soldiers on the battlefield and use artificial intelligence to speed up its war planning and fighting capabilities.
The Pentagon was preparing to announce its decision between the finalists, Amazon and Microsoft, when Trump publicly waded into the fray in July. Trump said then that other companies told him the contract “wasn’t competitively bid”, and he said the administration would “take a very long look”. Oracle had also protested after it and IBM were eliminated from an earlier round of bidding.
Amazon is looking for more information about what happened before and after Trump ordered the review. Amazon’s court filing cites an alleged comment that surfaced in a recent book that said Trump in 2018 privately told the then defense secretary, Jim Mattis, to “screw Amazon” out of the contract. The George Washington University procurement law expert Steve Schooner said a deposition of Trump would be “clearly relevant to the primary allegations underlying their lawsuit”, but that did not mean it would happen.
“I can’t imagine this president sitting for that deposition,” Schooner said in an email Monday. Besides seeking Trump’s deposition, Amazon is also asking to depose Mattis, the current defense secretary, Mark Esper, and other government officials. Amazon said it wanted more information about the “unusual timing” of Esper recusing himself from the decision-making process because of his son’s work for IBM.
That came in October, long after IBM was no longer in the running for the contract and despite Esper earlier pledging to take a “hard look” at the bids after Trump ordered the review. In a filing with the US court of federal claims unsealed Monday, Amazon said Trump had a “well-documented personal animus towards” Amazon, its CEO Jeff Bezos and the Washington Post, which Bezos owns. Amazon said Trump was the only one who could testify about the “totality of his conversations and the overall message he conveyed” about the bidding process.
Trump has accused Amazon of not paying its fair share of taxes and of putting brick-and-mortar stores out of business. Trump has also gone after Bezos personally and accused the Post of being Amazon’s “chief lobbyist”. The White House and justice department declined comment Monday. The defense department said it “strongly opposes” Amazon’s request to depose senior.
The project, known as Joint Enterprise Defense Infrastructure, or Jedi, will store and process vast amounts of classified data, allowing the US military to improve communications with soldiers on the battlefield and use artificial intelligence to speed up its war planning and fighting capabilities.
The Pentagon was preparing to announce its decision between the finalists, Amazon and Microsoft, when Trump publicly waded into the fray in July. Trump said then that other companies told him the contract “wasn’t competitively bid”, and he said the administration would “take a very long look”. Oracle had also protested after it and IBM were eliminated from an earlier round of bidding.
Amazon is looking for more information about what happened before and after Trump ordered the review. Amazon’s court filing cites an alleged comment that surfaced in a recent book that said Trump in 2018 privately told the then defense secretary, Jim Mattis, to “screw Amazon” out of the contract. The George Washington University procurement law expert Steve Schooner said a deposition of Trump would be “clearly relevant to the primary allegations underlying their lawsuit”, but that did not mean it would happen.
“I can’t imagine this president sitting for that deposition,” Schooner said in an email Monday. Besides seeking Trump’s deposition, Amazon is also asking to depose Mattis, the current defense secretary, Mark Esper, and other government officials. Amazon said it wanted more information about the “unusual timing” of Esper recusing himself from the decision-making process because of his son’s work for IBM.
That came in October, long after IBM was no longer in the running for the contract and despite Esper earlier pledging to take a “hard look” at the bids after Trump ordered the review. In a filing with the US court of federal claims unsealed Monday, Amazon said Trump had a “well-documented personal animus towards” Amazon, its CEO Jeff Bezos and the Washington Post, which Bezos owns. Amazon said Trump was the only one who could testify about the “totality of his conversations and the overall message he conveyed” about the bidding process.
Trump has accused Amazon of not paying its fair share of taxes and of putting brick-and-mortar stores out of business. Trump has also gone after Bezos personally and accused the Post of being Amazon’s “chief lobbyist”. The White House and justice department declined comment Monday. The defense department said it “strongly opposes” Amazon’s request to depose senior.
AI Disclaimer: An advanced artificial intelligence (AI) system generated the content of this page on its own. This innovative technology conducts extensive research from a variety of reliable sources, performs rigorous fact-checking and verification, cleans up and balances biased or manipulated content, and presents a minimal factual summary that is just enough yet essential for you to function as an informed and educated citizen. Please keep in mind, however, that this system is an evolving technology, and as a result, the article may contain accidental inaccuracies or errors. We urge you to help us improve our site by reporting any inaccuracies you find using the "Contact Us" link at the bottom of this page. Your helpful feedback helps us improve our system and deliver more precise content. When you find an article of interest here, please look for the full and extensive coverage of this topic in traditional news sources, as they are written by professional journalists that we try to support, not replace. We appreciate your understanding and assistance.
