UN nuclear watchdog lays out plan for protection zone around Zaporizhzhia plant
IAEA chief says Ukraine and Russia have shown interest in the agreement.
The U.N.'s nuclear watchdog on Monday laid out plans for establishing a security protection zone around Europe's largest nuclear power plant in the south of Ukraine.
The idea is to "keep things simple," said Rafael Mariano Grossi, the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). "What we need here, really, is to have Ukraine and Russia not attacking or not shelling at the plant."
The establishment of a security zone would be "a commitment that no military action will include or will imply aiming at the plant or at a radius affecting its normal operation."
The IAEA would ensure that the security perimeter is respected, Grossi added: "We have our monitors, inspectors there that can inform whether this is being observed or not."
Grossi said the plan is being discussed with Ukraine and Russia, and that he has "seen signs that they are interested in this agreement."
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has repeatedly called for the full demilitarization of the plant and criticized Grossi for not speaking out more forcefully in favor of that idea.
Speaking at a press conference Monday, Grossi said: "I’m working within my mandate. I cannot get into areas that have to do with larger demilitarization or movement of troops."
The Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant was seized by Russian troops in March near the start of the war, but is still operated by Ukrainian staff. Despite the restoration of a backup power line after it was damaged from shelling, the last operating unit at the plant was shut down on Sunday.
Grossi cautioned that "you cannot stay without any external source of power ... without damaging a number of parts, notably the turbine blades" of the reactors. Power is also required to keep their cooling systems running.
He added that, according to the agency's information, Ukraine is trying to "keep the plant operational" by restoring external power supply.
The IAEA chief also warned that as "the shelling continues," if a missile was to hit a reactor or the facilities where the spent nuclear fuel is stored, it "could have very serious consequences."
The idea is to "keep things simple," said Rafael Mariano Grossi, the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). "What we need here, really, is to have Ukraine and Russia not attacking or not shelling at the plant."
The establishment of a security zone would be "a commitment that no military action will include or will imply aiming at the plant or at a radius affecting its normal operation."
The IAEA would ensure that the security perimeter is respected, Grossi added: "We have our monitors, inspectors there that can inform whether this is being observed or not."
Grossi said the plan is being discussed with Ukraine and Russia, and that he has "seen signs that they are interested in this agreement."
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has repeatedly called for the full demilitarization of the plant and criticized Grossi for not speaking out more forcefully in favor of that idea.
Speaking at a press conference Monday, Grossi said: "I’m working within my mandate. I cannot get into areas that have to do with larger demilitarization or movement of troops."
The Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant was seized by Russian troops in March near the start of the war, but is still operated by Ukrainian staff. Despite the restoration of a backup power line after it was damaged from shelling, the last operating unit at the plant was shut down on Sunday.
Grossi cautioned that "you cannot stay without any external source of power ... without damaging a number of parts, notably the turbine blades" of the reactors. Power is also required to keep their cooling systems running.
He added that, according to the agency's information, Ukraine is trying to "keep the plant operational" by restoring external power supply.
The IAEA chief also warned that as "the shelling continues," if a missile was to hit a reactor or the facilities where the spent nuclear fuel is stored, it "could have very serious consequences."
AI Disclaimer: An advanced artificial intelligence (AI) system generated the content of this page on its own. This innovative technology conducts extensive research from a variety of reliable sources, performs rigorous fact-checking and verification, cleans up and balances biased or manipulated content, and presents a minimal factual summary that is just enough yet essential for you to function as an informed and educated citizen. Please keep in mind, however, that this system is an evolving technology, and as a result, the article may contain accidental inaccuracies or errors. We urge you to help us improve our site by reporting any inaccuracies you find using the "Contact Us" link at the bottom of this page. Your helpful feedback helps us improve our system and deliver more precise content. When you find an article of interest here, please look for the full and extensive coverage of this topic in traditional news sources, as they are written by professional journalists that we try to support, not replace. We appreciate your understanding and assistance.
