Poland removes controversial legal body condemned by EU
Critics say removal is largely cosmetic as chamber with members chosen by president will replace it
Polish lawmakers have approved removing a controversial disciplinary body within the country’s top court that the rightwing government has used to sanction outspoken judges and which has drawn condemnation from the EU.
Poland’s government expects the removal of the Disciplinary Chamber of the supreme court to end its spat with the EU, paving the way for an agreement that will result in Brussels’ disbursing billions of euros of frozen recovery funds for Poland.
The vote on Thursday in the lower house was 231-208, with 13 abstentions. The ruling coalition was for the move while the opposition was against it, saying the changes are largely cosmetic.
The Polish prime minister, Mateusz Morawiecki, said in parliament before the vote that EU Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen is expected to sign the agreement in Warsaw on 2 June.
Warsaw’s relations with Brussels have grown tense under the current government, largely due to the control it has taken of the judiciary, placing loyalists at top bodies and punishing judges who protested those moves.
But ties have warmed up as Poland has taken an active role in supporting Ukraine in its struggle against Russia’s invasion. Poland has taken in 3.6 million refugees from Ukraine and the government has been pushing for EU funds to accommodate and integrate the refugees.
The European court of justice last year found the Disciplinary Chamber to be in violation of the EU’s rule of law principles, urged Poland to remove it and fined Poland €1m (£850,000) a day as long as the body continues.
Critics say the change is superficial and misleading, because the controversial body will be replaced with a professional responsibility chamber at the supreme court whose members will be chosen by the president, Andrzej Duda.
The new judicial regulations still need approval from the senate, where the opposition has a narrow edge, and from Duda, who is their chief author.
It was not clear if these approvals would be granted before 2 June.
Poland’s government expects the removal of the Disciplinary Chamber of the supreme court to end its spat with the EU, paving the way for an agreement that will result in Brussels’ disbursing billions of euros of frozen recovery funds for Poland.
The vote on Thursday in the lower house was 231-208, with 13 abstentions. The ruling coalition was for the move while the opposition was against it, saying the changes are largely cosmetic.
The Polish prime minister, Mateusz Morawiecki, said in parliament before the vote that EU Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen is expected to sign the agreement in Warsaw on 2 June.
Warsaw’s relations with Brussels have grown tense under the current government, largely due to the control it has taken of the judiciary, placing loyalists at top bodies and punishing judges who protested those moves.
But ties have warmed up as Poland has taken an active role in supporting Ukraine in its struggle against Russia’s invasion. Poland has taken in 3.6 million refugees from Ukraine and the government has been pushing for EU funds to accommodate and integrate the refugees.
The European court of justice last year found the Disciplinary Chamber to be in violation of the EU’s rule of law principles, urged Poland to remove it and fined Poland €1m (£850,000) a day as long as the body continues.
Critics say the change is superficial and misleading, because the controversial body will be replaced with a professional responsibility chamber at the supreme court whose members will be chosen by the president, Andrzej Duda.
The new judicial regulations still need approval from the senate, where the opposition has a narrow edge, and from Duda, who is their chief author.
It was not clear if these approvals would be granted before 2 June.
AI Disclaimer: An advanced artificial intelligence (AI) system generated the content of this page on its own. This innovative technology conducts extensive research from a variety of reliable sources, performs rigorous fact-checking and verification, cleans up and balances biased or manipulated content, and presents a minimal factual summary that is just enough yet essential for you to function as an informed and educated citizen. Please keep in mind, however, that this system is an evolving technology, and as a result, the article may contain accidental inaccuracies or errors. We urge you to help us improve our site by reporting any inaccuracies you find using the "Contact Us" link at the bottom of this page. Your helpful feedback helps us improve our system and deliver more precise content. When you find an article of interest here, please look for the full and extensive coverage of this topic in traditional news sources, as they are written by professional journalists that we try to support, not replace. We appreciate your understanding and assistance.
