Katy Perry Loses Trademark Battle Against Fashion Designer With Same Name
"This is a tale of two women, two teenage dreams and one name," Ms Markovic said in her judgment.
Singer Katy Perry has lost a trademark battle with an Australian fashion designer who was born with a differently spelt same name. According to a BBC report, Katie Perry, now known as Katie Taylor, filed a lawsuit against the pop star, claiming that her merchandise infringed the trademark she owned.
The media portal reported that a judge agreed that clothing sold for Katy's 2014 Australian tour did breach Katie's trademark.
Federal court judge Brigitte Markovic ruled that Katy Perry's company Kitty Purry partially infringed the trademark of Katie Taylor's business, which sells mostly clothes online, by promoting the singer's products through posts on social media, a court filing out on Thursday showed.
Damages are due to be decided at a later date.
"This is a tale of two women, two teenage dreams and one name," Markovic said in her judgment.
The judge dismissed a bid by the popstar seeking to cancel the Katie Perry trademark, Reuters reported.
Taylor, whose birth name was Katie Perry, called the verdict a "David and Goliath" win for small businesses.
"Not only have I fought myself, but I fought for small businesses in this country, many of them started by women, who can find themselves up against overseas entities who have much more financial power than we do," she said in a blog post.
Representatives of Katy Perry could not be immediately reached.
The tussle between the popstar and the Australian fashion designer over the homophonous name began in 2008 when Taylor registered the "Katie Perry" brand in Australia.
Katy Perry initially tried to block the registration and later engaged lawyers to try to force the designer to cease and forever desist from using the mark but later abandoned the move, Taylor said.
The media portal reported that a judge agreed that clothing sold for Katy's 2014 Australian tour did breach Katie's trademark.
Federal court judge Brigitte Markovic ruled that Katy Perry's company Kitty Purry partially infringed the trademark of Katie Taylor's business, which sells mostly clothes online, by promoting the singer's products through posts on social media, a court filing out on Thursday showed.
Damages are due to be decided at a later date.
"This is a tale of two women, two teenage dreams and one name," Markovic said in her judgment.
The judge dismissed a bid by the popstar seeking to cancel the Katie Perry trademark, Reuters reported.
Taylor, whose birth name was Katie Perry, called the verdict a "David and Goliath" win for small businesses.
"Not only have I fought myself, but I fought for small businesses in this country, many of them started by women, who can find themselves up against overseas entities who have much more financial power than we do," she said in a blog post.
Representatives of Katy Perry could not be immediately reached.
The tussle between the popstar and the Australian fashion designer over the homophonous name began in 2008 when Taylor registered the "Katie Perry" brand in Australia.
Katy Perry initially tried to block the registration and later engaged lawyers to try to force the designer to cease and forever desist from using the mark but later abandoned the move, Taylor said.
AI Disclaimer: An advanced artificial intelligence (AI) system generated the content of this page on its own. This innovative technology conducts extensive research from a variety of reliable sources, performs rigorous fact-checking and verification, cleans up and balances biased or manipulated content, and presents a minimal factual summary that is just enough yet essential for you to function as an informed and educated citizen. Please keep in mind, however, that this system is an evolving technology, and as a result, the article may contain accidental inaccuracies or errors. We urge you to help us improve our site by reporting any inaccuracies you find using the "Contact Us" link at the bottom of this page. Your helpful feedback helps us improve our system and deliver more precise content. When you find an article of interest here, please look for the full and extensive coverage of this topic in traditional news sources, as they are written by professional journalists that we try to support, not replace. We appreciate your understanding and assistance.
