EU Lawmakers Seek To Intensify Efforts To Protect Animals Used In Scientific Research
The European Parliament aimed to make necessary animal testing regimes more humane, and phase out non-essential animal experimentation in the EU.
The European Parliament on Thursday asked the European Union to intensify efforts to stop using animals for scientific research.
The non-binding resolution, approved by an overwhelming majority of legislators, was welcomed by animal rights activists.
"MEPs (Members of European Parliament) request an EU-wide action plan with ambitious and achievable objectives as well as timelines for phasing-out the use of animals in research and testing," a statement said.
"They want sufficient medium- and long-term funding to be made available to ensure the fast development, validation and introduction of alternative testing methods."
The EU has banned experimentation on animals for cosmetics since 2009 and has regulations to try to protect animals still used for scientific research deemed necessary.
More than 12 million animals, 90 per cent of which are mice, were bred and killed in 2017 for research purposes, with many ultimately not used in experiments, a European Commission report said.
The EU lawmakers said they "understood that there are cases where animal experiments are still needed to gain scientific insights for certain diseases due to the current unavailability of non-animal methods".
"They underline however that these testing regimes must only take place where conditions are optimised to minimise pain, distress and suffering," the statement said.
Animal rights group Humane Society International called the resolution "an historic opportunity to take animal suffering out of the equation and shift the focus to modern, cutting-edge, human relevant research".
The non-binding resolution, approved by an overwhelming majority of legislators, was welcomed by animal rights activists.
"MEPs (Members of European Parliament) request an EU-wide action plan with ambitious and achievable objectives as well as timelines for phasing-out the use of animals in research and testing," a statement said.
"They want sufficient medium- and long-term funding to be made available to ensure the fast development, validation and introduction of alternative testing methods."
The EU has banned experimentation on animals for cosmetics since 2009 and has regulations to try to protect animals still used for scientific research deemed necessary.
More than 12 million animals, 90 per cent of which are mice, were bred and killed in 2017 for research purposes, with many ultimately not used in experiments, a European Commission report said.
The EU lawmakers said they "understood that there are cases where animal experiments are still needed to gain scientific insights for certain diseases due to the current unavailability of non-animal methods".
"They underline however that these testing regimes must only take place where conditions are optimised to minimise pain, distress and suffering," the statement said.
Animal rights group Humane Society International called the resolution "an historic opportunity to take animal suffering out of the equation and shift the focus to modern, cutting-edge, human relevant research".
AI Disclaimer: An advanced artificial intelligence (AI) system generated the content of this page on its own. This innovative technology conducts extensive research from a variety of reliable sources, performs rigorous fact-checking and verification, cleans up and balances biased or manipulated content, and presents a minimal factual summary that is just enough yet essential for you to function as an informed and educated citizen. Please keep in mind, however, that this system is an evolving technology, and as a result, the article may contain accidental inaccuracies or errors. We urge you to help us improve our site by reporting any inaccuracies you find using the "Contact Us" link at the bottom of this page. Your helpful feedback helps us improve our system and deliver more precise content. When you find an article of interest here, please look for the full and extensive coverage of this topic in traditional news sources, as they are written by professional journalists that we try to support, not replace. We appreciate your understanding and assistance.