Britain commits US$333 million to help carriers replace Huawei 5G
The Chinese telecoms firm is set to be banned from the country’s next-generation networks by 2027 due to security concerns
Britain will spend £250 million (US$333 million) to diversify its sources of 5G wireless equipment after banning China’s Huawei Technologies Co. from supplying the next-generation technology.
Huawei is set to be excluded from British 5G networks by 2027 due to security concerns, leaving phone carriers reliant on a supply duopoly of Finland’s Nokia Oyj and Sweden’s Ericsson AB.
Around £50 million ($67 million) of the total will be spent next year to help build “a secure and resilient 5G network” according to documents published on Wednesday as part of Chancellor of the Exchequer Rishi Sunak’s spending review.
The resulting reduction in competition could hurt security and push up prices, so Digital Secretary Oliver Dowden has started a task force to increase the number of suppliers. He is set to publish more details before the end of the year.
Britain’s crackdown on Huawei came in July after UK officials said US sanctions made it impossible to verify the security of Huawei’s supply chain.
The White House accuses Huawei of being a security risk, which the company has always denied.
Since then, Nokia and Ericsson have already won major contracts from British carriers like BT Group Plc and CK Hutchison Holdings’ Three UK.
The phone industry is banking that longer-term initiatives such as OpenRAN – a project to make mobile network equipment more interoperable and encourage new suppliers – will eventually introduce more competition.
Other large global suppliers like Korea’s Samsung Electronics Co. do not currently offer the right kind of equipment to win immediate big deals with British carriers.
Huawei is set to be excluded from British 5G networks by 2027 due to security concerns, leaving phone carriers reliant on a supply duopoly of Finland’s Nokia Oyj and Sweden’s Ericsson AB.
Around £50 million ($67 million) of the total will be spent next year to help build “a secure and resilient 5G network” according to documents published on Wednesday as part of Chancellor of the Exchequer Rishi Sunak’s spending review.
The resulting reduction in competition could hurt security and push up prices, so Digital Secretary Oliver Dowden has started a task force to increase the number of suppliers. He is set to publish more details before the end of the year.
Britain’s crackdown on Huawei came in July after UK officials said US sanctions made it impossible to verify the security of Huawei’s supply chain.
The White House accuses Huawei of being a security risk, which the company has always denied.
Since then, Nokia and Ericsson have already won major contracts from British carriers like BT Group Plc and CK Hutchison Holdings’ Three UK.
The phone industry is banking that longer-term initiatives such as OpenRAN – a project to make mobile network equipment more interoperable and encourage new suppliers – will eventually introduce more competition.
Other large global suppliers like Korea’s Samsung Electronics Co. do not currently offer the right kind of equipment to win immediate big deals with British carriers.
AI Disclaimer: An advanced artificial intelligence (AI) system generated the content of this page on its own. This innovative technology conducts extensive research from a variety of reliable sources, performs rigorous fact-checking and verification, cleans up and balances biased or manipulated content, and presents a minimal factual summary that is just enough yet essential for you to function as an informed and educated citizen. Please keep in mind, however, that this system is an evolving technology, and as a result, the article may contain accidental inaccuracies or errors. We urge you to help us improve our site by reporting any inaccuracies you find using the "Contact Us" link at the bottom of this page. Your helpful feedback helps us improve our system and deliver more precise content. When you find an article of interest here, please look for the full and extensive coverage of this topic in traditional news sources, as they are written by professional journalists that we try to support, not replace. We appreciate your understanding and assistance.