Apple wins appeal against UK's decision to investigate its mobile browser
Apple Inc (AAPL.O) won its appeal against the decision by Britain's antitrust regulator to launch an investigation into its mobile browser and cloud gaming services, the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruled on Friday.
Regulator the Competition and Market Authority (CMA) opened a full investigation in November into the dominance of Apple and Alphabet Inc's Google (GOOGL.O) in mobile browsers, and the possibility of the iPhone maker restricting the cloud gaming market through its app store.
Apple argued that the CMA had "no power" to launch such a probe because it did so too late.
Its lawyer Timothy Otty earlier this month said that the market investigation should have been opened last June at the same time the CMA published a report on mobile ecosystems, which found the two tech giants had an "effective duopoly."
The CAT endorsed Apple's argument, saying that in declining to take action at that time only in the expectation of receiving further powers it might well be said that the CMA "erred in law".
The CMA said it was disappointed with the ruling.
"Today's judgment has found there are material constraints on the CMA's general ability to refer markets for in-depth investigations," it said in a statement.
"This risks substantially undermining the CMA's ability to efficiently and effectively investigate and intervene in markets where competition is not working well.
"Given the importance of today's judgment," it added, "we will be considering our options including seeking permission to appeal."
Apple in a statement issued after the ruling said it believed in "vibrant and competitive markets where innovation can flourish."
"We are pleased with the Competition Appeal Tribunal's decision and will continue working to deliver support for developers and a safe and secure experience for users," the company said.
Apple argued that the CMA had "no power" to launch such a probe because it did so too late.
Its lawyer Timothy Otty earlier this month said that the market investigation should have been opened last June at the same time the CMA published a report on mobile ecosystems, which found the two tech giants had an "effective duopoly."
The CAT endorsed Apple's argument, saying that in declining to take action at that time only in the expectation of receiving further powers it might well be said that the CMA "erred in law".
The CMA said it was disappointed with the ruling.
"Today's judgment has found there are material constraints on the CMA's general ability to refer markets for in-depth investigations," it said in a statement.
"This risks substantially undermining the CMA's ability to efficiently and effectively investigate and intervene in markets where competition is not working well.
"Given the importance of today's judgment," it added, "we will be considering our options including seeking permission to appeal."
Apple in a statement issued after the ruling said it believed in "vibrant and competitive markets where innovation can flourish."
"We are pleased with the Competition Appeal Tribunal's decision and will continue working to deliver support for developers and a safe and secure experience for users," the company said.
AI Disclaimer: An advanced artificial intelligence (AI) system generated the content of this page on its own. This innovative technology conducts extensive research from a variety of reliable sources, performs rigorous fact-checking and verification, cleans up and balances biased or manipulated content, and presents a minimal factual summary that is just enough yet essential for you to function as an informed and educated citizen. Please keep in mind, however, that this system is an evolving technology, and as a result, the article may contain accidental inaccuracies or errors. We urge you to help us improve our site by reporting any inaccuracies you find using the "Contact Us" link at the bottom of this page. Your helpful feedback helps us improve our system and deliver more precise content. When you find an article of interest here, please look for the full and extensive coverage of this topic in traditional news sources, as they are written by professional journalists that we try to support, not replace. We appreciate your understanding and assistance.
