EU Proposes Phasing Out Russian Oil and Gas by End of 2027 to End Energy Dependence
Brussels sets a step‑wise timeline to eliminate all Russian fossil fuel imports, reinforced by U.S. support and customs safeguards to prevent circumvention.
The European Union has unveiled a legally binding proposal to eliminate all imports of Russian oil and gas by the end of 2027.
The initiative emerges from the European Commission’s REPowerEU roadmap, aiming to sever energy ties that have long underpinned Moscow’s war finances.
Under the proposed regulation, Russian gas imports through new contracts would be banned from January first, 2026, while existing short‑term contracts would expire by mid‑June of that year.
A limited exception applies to land‑locked countries whose long‑term pipeline agreements would remain valid until the end of 2027.
All remaining contracts, including those tied to liquefied natural gas terminal services, would cease by the close of that year.
Member states are also required to draft national diversification plans, including precise timelines and milestones, ahead of a January first, 2028, target for oil import termination.
The proposal is structured to advance under a reinforced majority vote, bypassing any veto by individual states such as Hungary or Slovakia.
This step‑by‑step approach is designed to safeguard energy security while reducing Europe's reliance on Russian fossil fuels.
Customs protocols would also be tightened to prevent circumvention, such as the rebranding of Russian gas as 'transit' fuel, especially through pipelines like TurkStream.
Importers would need to provide rigorous documentation validating the non‑Russian origin of gas shipments.
The EU’s Energy Commissioner welcomed recent support from U.S. leadership urging Europe to end Russian oil purchases—an alignment seen as reinforcing the bloc’s strategic energy decoupling from Moscow.
Simultaneously, Brussels and Washington are advancing discussions toward an energy agreement worth up to two hundred and fifty billion dollars annually, aimed at bolstering EU energy resilience through alternative supply channels.
Hungary and Slovakia, which remain heavily reliant on Russian pipeline deliveries, have expressed concern over potential supply disruptions and rising energy costs.
Nevertheless, the regulatory mechanism allowing adoption by qualified majority votes ensures that the initiative can proceed despite such reservations.
The proposal emerges from a broader EU energy transition strategy that has already sharply reduced coal and oil imports from Russia.
It positions the Union on a sustainable path toward energy independence while reinforcing economic and geopolitical resilience in the wake of Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine.
The initiative emerges from the European Commission’s REPowerEU roadmap, aiming to sever energy ties that have long underpinned Moscow’s war finances.
Under the proposed regulation, Russian gas imports through new contracts would be banned from January first, 2026, while existing short‑term contracts would expire by mid‑June of that year.
A limited exception applies to land‑locked countries whose long‑term pipeline agreements would remain valid until the end of 2027.
All remaining contracts, including those tied to liquefied natural gas terminal services, would cease by the close of that year.
Member states are also required to draft national diversification plans, including precise timelines and milestones, ahead of a January first, 2028, target for oil import termination.
The proposal is structured to advance under a reinforced majority vote, bypassing any veto by individual states such as Hungary or Slovakia.
This step‑by‑step approach is designed to safeguard energy security while reducing Europe's reliance on Russian fossil fuels.
Customs protocols would also be tightened to prevent circumvention, such as the rebranding of Russian gas as 'transit' fuel, especially through pipelines like TurkStream.
Importers would need to provide rigorous documentation validating the non‑Russian origin of gas shipments.
The EU’s Energy Commissioner welcomed recent support from U.S. leadership urging Europe to end Russian oil purchases—an alignment seen as reinforcing the bloc’s strategic energy decoupling from Moscow.
Simultaneously, Brussels and Washington are advancing discussions toward an energy agreement worth up to two hundred and fifty billion dollars annually, aimed at bolstering EU energy resilience through alternative supply channels.
Hungary and Slovakia, which remain heavily reliant on Russian pipeline deliveries, have expressed concern over potential supply disruptions and rising energy costs.
Nevertheless, the regulatory mechanism allowing adoption by qualified majority votes ensures that the initiative can proceed despite such reservations.
The proposal emerges from a broader EU energy transition strategy that has already sharply reduced coal and oil imports from Russia.
It positions the Union on a sustainable path toward energy independence while reinforcing economic and geopolitical resilience in the wake of Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine.
AI Disclaimer: An advanced artificial intelligence (AI) system generated the content of this page on its own. This innovative technology conducts extensive research from a variety of reliable sources, performs rigorous fact-checking and verification, cleans up and balances biased or manipulated content, and presents a minimal factual summary that is just enough yet essential for you to function as an informed and educated citizen. Please keep in mind, however, that this system is an evolving technology, and as a result, the article may contain accidental inaccuracies or errors. We urge you to help us improve our site by reporting any inaccuracies you find using the "Contact Us" link at the bottom of this page. Your helpful feedback helps us improve our system and deliver more precise content. When you find an article of interest here, please look for the full and extensive coverage of this topic in traditional news sources, as they are written by professional journalists that we try to support, not replace. We appreciate your understanding and assistance.
